Bio-Innovations in Translational Immunology and Applied Microbiology (BITIAM)
Editor – in – Chief: Simona Ivana
Covers a wide range of questions in Immunology and Applied Microbiology and its broad range of applications. Devotes particular attention to events in Romanian and International Science.
Presents: Original Research Papers; Review Articles; Short Communications; Research Project, Patent or Book Reviews; Resident Researchers Articles; Letters; Science and Society Articles; Spotlights; Scientific Life; News Articles; Feature Articles; Correspondence from Readers; Forum Articles; Historical perspectives.
Founded in 2017, the Journal Bio-Innovations in Translational Immunology and Applied Microbiology (BITIAM) covers a wide range of problems in the areas of: Innovations in Translational Immunology and Applied Microbiology; Vaccines Development; Immune Tolerance; Autoimmunity; Microbial Diseases; Microbial Immunopathology; Antibiotics Resistance; Genomics and Proteomics; Applied Microbial and Cell Physiology; Animal Health; Biodefense; Biotransformation and Biodegradation; Bioremediation; Bacteriology; Mycology; Virology; Public Health Microbiology; Prebiotics and Probiotics and Intestinal Microbiology; Food Microbiology; Water Microbiology; Disease Therapy. The journal also publishes reviews of new books.
While intended primarily for specialists at veterinary clinics and human hospitals, BITIAM represents a valuable source of essential information for university research departments, industrial, agricultural, and environmental-control laboratories, universities, and medical departments. BITIAM is a peer reviewed journal.
The final decision on the acceptance of an article for publication is made by the Editor-in-Chief.
Any invited reviewer who feels unqualified or unable to review the manuscript due to the conflict of interests should promptly notify the editors and decline the invitation.
Reviewers should formulate their statements clearly in a sound and reasoned way so that authors can use reviewer’s arguments to improve the manuscript. Personal criticism of the authors must be avoided. Reviewers should indicate in a review (i) any relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors, (ii) anything that has been reported in previous publications and not given appropriate reference or citation, (ii) any substantial similarity or overlap with any other manuscript (published or unpublished) of which they have personal knowledge.